Fritz Thomas

03 Sep, 2008

Closer look at Google Chrome Fine Print

Posted by: Fritz Thomas In: Overall

Daya Baran writes about some of the fine prints of google chrome.

“By submitting, posting or displaying the content you give Google a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any content which you submit, post or display on or through, the services. This license is for the sole purpose of enabling Google to display, distribute and promote the services and may be revoked for certain services as defined in the additional terms of those services.”

Sounds strange, doesn’t it?

Read the whole post on WebGuild

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • DZone
  • MisterWong
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • Fark
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • MisterWong.DE
  • Twitter
  • Twitthis
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yigg

4 Responses to "Closer look at Google Chrome Fine Print"

1 | media kingdom

September 3rd, 2008 at 6:23 pm

Avatar

despite the rumors, i’m finding Chrome’s speed to be inconsistent; it seems to alternate between going lightning fast and then hanging for no apparent reason…

2 | Fritz Thomas

September 4th, 2008 at 10:43 am

Avatar

But you should not forget that it is yet only a beta. But anyhow… I have to say that i “like” google in some ways, but i don’t think they should make another new browser. Because of many things:
* They will implement “their” HTML5 – which is not really a standard. HTML5 has its advantages for sure, but if they will have a good market share, i do not think if this is good for the whole Internet and its standards.
* Why do they make a new browser? One reason is: MORE DATA. And i do not know if this is good.

3 | Chrome? Beta Version - Page 3 - StreetHop.com

September 4th, 2008 at 12:59 pm

Avatar

[...] Closer look at Google Chrome Fine Print | Overall | Fritz Thomas *deletes* [...]

4 | frank burns

September 10th, 2008 at 12:55 pm

Avatar

Whilst it is true that Chrome is in Beta Mode, anything the developers are working on to improve their service must have errors within them, so they can be fixed permanently.It was the same with Internet Explorer but in Microsoft’s case, their way of dealing with fixing their problem was by downloading & installing “Hot-Fix-Updates” which also meant,downloading huge update files that led to other security related problems which needed to be fixed again,again & again. For chrome, let’s lay our faith in their developers in the sense, this paradox won’t affect us as it did for IE. Whilst we’re using Chrome, don’t forget that we are also Beta Testers and anything we find obscure with the browser is up to us to help change by contacting Google to represent our views & performance factors.If we don’t do this, how can we expect changes versus updates to help fix the areas of concern that we’re griping about.
May the Force be with You!

Comment Form


  • admin: Hi! For more information go to http://extjs.com/ . There is a preview video of this Tool called Ext.De
  • jagocoding: nice info bro... where can i download this tools ?? can u give me ulr, this is free or not ?
  • admin: Of course! This should be rm -rf /tmp/*
  • Christian: rm -rf /tmp* bad idea. at least do rm -rf /tmp/* but if things go worse it will skrew your X Session
  • Aleksandr: Hi! Thank you, it really works, you could even do it in one line like here: http://www.devhands.com/2010/01/how-to-get-the-full-path-from-the-running
  • matt: thanks for the tip. freeing up the distfiles freed me up 5GB of diskspace. My root is only 20GB which I thought should be plenty but my disk hit 100
  • admin: Kurz nachdem ich mein Tutorial geschrieben habe hat sich einiges im Zend Framework geändert bzw. wurde in die Coding Standards aufgenommen. Deshalb i
  • DarthMaul: Thank you. You seem to be the only one who could answer this for me. Everyone else seems to recommend using $PWD or pwd command and just won't listen
  • Jochen: Der Fehler kann _auch_ auftreten, wenn an den Dateien das Lese-Recht für den Webserver fehlt.
  • iptoux: darf man fragen ob da noch nen weiterer teil kommt ? ich mein ist ja jetzt bald 2 jahre her seit dem ersten teil.